Pages

Now it’s getting ridiculous

Recall the problem: there’s $1.5 trillion in the Social Security trust fund. Currently Social Security revenues are greater than benefit payments, so the trust fund is projected to grow over time (to the tune of about $150 billion a year). But starting around 2027, revenues (including interest) fall below benefit payments, so the trust fund starts to decline. By 2041, the trust fund will be exhausted. The system is insolvent. The Bush “plan” (I’ll put the quotation marks in because in fact there is no concrete proposal before Congress or the public) is in a nutshell to borrow a bunch of money, plunk it in private accounts, cut benefits starting around 2041 to solve the insolvency problem, and cross fingers in hope that the rate of return on the private accounts is at least as high as the rate of return on traditional Social Security minus the future benefit cuts. The public and probably a majority of members of Congress hates this plan because with the government already borrowing $500 billion a year to finance everything outside of Social Security, who really wants to borrow a couple of trillion more to deal with Social Security?



So now here come Senator DeMint and McCrery with a plan by which the government can finance private accounts without that nasty borrowing. Just take the money from the trust fund! The money is just sitting there, right? So allow workers to put money into private accounts instead of the trust fund, and voila, you’ve got yourself a privatized Social Security system. Of course any idiot (and there are a lot of us out there) can see the fallacy in this plan: the trust fund is extinguished that much earlier, so at that point we’d have to borrow enough to replace the funds that went into private accounts rather than the trust fund. This is like financing the purchase of a house by cashing in your pension rather than taking out a mortgage loan. This shell game might be great politics (if you (a) didn’t follow the analysis above, and – this is important – (b) don’t realize by now that the Republicans are a bunch of snake oil salesmen, you might just believe that there’s $1.5 trillion in free money that can be used to solve the Social Security problem) but it’s lousy, really lousy, economics. Also an idiotic way to run a government.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

  • Stiglitz the Keynesian... Web review of economics: Stigliz has an article, "Capitalist Fools", in the January issue of Vanity Fair. He argues that the new depression is the result of:Firing...
  • It's Never Enough Until Your He... Web review of economics: Aaron Swartz quotes a paper by Louis Pascal posing a thought experiment. I wonder if many find this argument emotionally unsatisfying. It...
  • Michele Boldrin Confused About Marx... Web review of economics: Michele Boldrin has written a paper in which supposedly Marxian themes are treated in a Dynamic Stochastic Equilibrium Model (DSGE). He...
  • Negative Price Wicksell Effect, Pos... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI have previously suggested a taxonomy of Wicksell effects. This post presents an example with:The cost-minimizing...
  • Designing A Keynesian Stimulus Plan... Web review of economics: Some version of this New York Times article contains the following passage:"A blueprint for such spending can be found in a study financed...
  • Robert Paul Wolff Blogging On Books... Web review of economics: Here Wolff provides an overview of Marx, agrees with Morishima that Marx was a great economist, and mentions books by the analytical...
  • Simple and Expanded Reproduction... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionThis post presents a model in which a capitalist economy smoothly reproduces itself. The purpose of such a model is not to...
  • How Individuals Can Choose, Even Th... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI think of this post as posing a research question. S. Abu Turab Rizvi re-interprets the primitives of social choice theory...