testimony today:
“The planet has a fever. “If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor.” He added, “If the doctor says you need to intervene here, you don’t say ‘I read a science fiction novel that says it’s not a problem.’ You take action.”
The article continues...
"In written testimony for the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works, Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish statistician and author critical of people who present environmental problems as a crisis, asserted that Mr. Gore’s portrayal of global warming as a problem and his prescription for solving it were both deeply flawed.
Mr. Lomborg said that “global warming is real and man-made,” but that a focus on intensified energy research would be more effective and far cheaper than caps or taxes on greenhouse gas emissions or energy sources that produce them.
“Statements about the strong, ominous and immediate consequences of global warming are often wildly exaggerated,” he said. “We need a stronger focus on smart solutions rather than excessive if well-intentioned efforts.”"
Once again, it astounds me that conservatives find this kind of argument so appealing - witness Bush's efforts to increase government-sponsored research on alternative fuels while anything like a gas tax is off the table. Of course new technologies are the solution - the question is, is government-directed research the best way to develop them? We've got thousands of creative scientists and entrepreneurs who could be put to work developing new energy technologies. With gas at $2.50 a gallon and no guarantee that prices won't fall considerably below that, they don't have much incentive to get out there and innovate. Guarantee gas at $5 a gallon and the energy entrepreneurs will come out of the woodwork. Taxes on fossil fuels are not an alternative to developing new technology, they provide a necessary institutional incentive for their development.
When did the conservatives lose their faith in markets (adjusted with the occasional Pigouvian tax)? Oh, right around the time Grover Norquist started forcing all Republican candidates to sign the no new taxes pledge.
I think he should run for president. I like his quip in - Stiglitz the Keynesian... Web review of economics: Stigliz has an article, "Capitalist Fools", in the January issue of Vanity Fair. He argues that the new depression is the result of:Firing...
- It's Never Enough Until Your He... Web review of economics: Aaron Swartz quotes a paper by Louis Pascal posing a thought experiment. I wonder if many find this argument emotionally unsatisfying. It...
- Michele Boldrin Confused About Marx... Web review of economics: Michele Boldrin has written a paper in which supposedly Marxian themes are treated in a Dynamic Stochastic Equilibrium Model (DSGE). He...
- Negative Price Wicksell Effect, Pos... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI have previously suggested a taxonomy of Wicksell effects. This post presents an example with:The cost-minimizing...
- Designing A Keynesian Stimulus Plan... Web review of economics: Some version of this New York Times article contains the following passage:"A blueprint for such spending can be found in a study financed...
- Robert Paul Wolff Blogging On Books... Web review of economics: Here Wolff provides an overview of Marx, agrees with Morishima that Marx was a great economist, and mentions books by the analytical...
- Simple and Expanded Reproduction... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionThis post presents a model in which a capitalist economy smoothly reproduces itself. The purpose of such a model is not to...
- How Individuals Can Choose, Even Th... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI think of this post as posing a research question. S. Abu Turab Rizvi re-interprets the primitives of social choice theory...
0 comments:
Post a Comment