Pages

Seifman Siphons Bowles’s Study

In yesterday’s New York Post, Dave Seifman, in citing the Center for an Urban Future report written by Jonathan Bowles, seems to imply that the study, done by “an independent think tank,” is unequivocally lauding the mayor’s economic development efforts in the city’s outer boroughs. That may be the way that William Cunningham, Bloomberg’s chief flack, would like the report to be perceived but there is, as we have already shown, much more to the report and the fact is that the study is critical of the mayor’s approach to economic development outside Manhattan.

In particular, Bowles focuses on the manner in which the Bloomberg team, because of a top down approach, has ignored the impact of development on existing businesses in the areas being targeted. The emblematic case is, of course, the Bronx Terminal Market and we welcome Dave Seifman, and the entire Post team at City Hall’s Room 9, to join us on June 8th at our BTM press conference. Now Dave, if you are going to give props to the outer borough development you should be eager to cover the other side.

In particular, isn’t it about time that all of our local press start to examine Bloomberg’s top down approach (or Doctoroff’s to be more accurate) and begin to dig a little bit more concerning the incestuous Doctoroff-Related love affair. Too often what happens is that the allocation of tens of millions of dollars to a favored developer is characterized by the press as “60 million dollars earmarked for the Bronx” rather than, as in the case of the Terminal Market, “60 million dollars allocated to Doctoroff’s close friend Steve Ross” (Of course when all is said and done this figure could double or even triple).

See you Wednesday Dave.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

  • Stiglitz the Keynesian... Web review of economics: Stigliz has an article, "Capitalist Fools", in the January issue of Vanity Fair. He argues that the new depression is the result of:Firing...
  • It's Never Enough Until Your He... Web review of economics: Aaron Swartz quotes a paper by Louis Pascal posing a thought experiment. I wonder if many find this argument emotionally unsatisfying. It...
  • Michele Boldrin Confused About Marx... Web review of economics: Michele Boldrin has written a paper in which supposedly Marxian themes are treated in a Dynamic Stochastic Equilibrium Model (DSGE). He...
  • Negative Price Wicksell Effect, Pos... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI have previously suggested a taxonomy of Wicksell effects. This post presents an example with:The cost-minimizing...
  • Designing A Keynesian Stimulus Plan... Web review of economics: Some version of this New York Times article contains the following passage:"A blueprint for such spending can be found in a study financed...
  • Robert Paul Wolff Blogging On Books... Web review of economics: Here Wolff provides an overview of Marx, agrees with Morishima that Marx was a great economist, and mentions books by the analytical...
  • Simple and Expanded Reproduction... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionThis post presents a model in which a capitalist economy smoothly reproduces itself. The purpose of such a model is not to...
  • How Individuals Can Choose, Even Th... Web review of economics: 1.0 IntroductionI think of this post as posing a research question. S. Abu Turab Rizvi re-interprets the primitives of social choice theory...